My First impression of the Chat GPT for research Interactive Learning Design is that it was visually appealing and well organized. As I looked at the course outline, I was a bit confused about why the modules were not equal weights and what caused the modules worth 15 to be more than the others. If the modules stay at their same weighted values, maybe indicate that the modules worth 15% are larger sections or more essential topics. Overall I like the use of embedded features on the website, as your learners can stay on the site for most of their work. I liked using a check-in point where your learners can check their understanding before moving on to the more formal evaluations. I am a bit confused by the knowledge heck as it does not seem to remember which questions you get right or wrong. I am not sure if it was intended that everyone would get 100% on these evaluations because they can do it as many times as they want without seeming to get penalized. If that is not the case, these short quizzes are worth 10-15% of the course grade. Possibly add more questions so the grades can be a bit more distributed. The final thing that I noticed was that for the final assessment. The website says that it is the ‘summative assessment’ I think that you could possibly use some easier-to-understand language for your audience, like ‘Final Assignment.’
